Here: visualise climate mitigation progress. A large screen is essential.
We are in the process of converting to different charting software. There’s two works in progress below.
The initial view shows three series:
1. The change in the observed 10-year average of the global average surface temperature, relative to that from 1850-1900 (proxy for the climate in pre-industrial times). Observed values are measured directly and fluctuate quite a lot each year due to natural processes (e.g. solar variation, volcanic eruptions, and El Niño oscillations). Averaging over 10 years reduces these fluctuations.
2. The component of the above that is calculated as human-induced; that is, the natural components are mathematically stripped out, leaving behind the warming caused by humans due to greenhouse gas emissions and other forcings (aerosol radiation interaction, aerosol-cloud interaction, black carbon on snow, contrails, ozone, stratospheric H2O, and land use). Human-induced values change more predictably and smoothly each year than observed values.
3. The uncertainty in the human-induced warming. Note that the observed value has an uncertainty too (typically narrower), but this is not shown.
The human-induced 10-year average can be used to check progress against the long-term temperature goals of the Paris Agreement – the lower 1.5°C goal is shown on the chart, as is an approximate breach year given the current trajectory of human-induced warming, as suggested by the source, see below. The Paris Agreement itself does not specify a method for deciding if certain levels have been reached.
By clicking on the legend you can enable the 1-year average equivalents of the series described above. These show what has happened recently with the climate, which is useful in its own right, though any single year’s observed warming is less useful as an indicator of long-term climate change. However, because human-induced warming is roughly linear, and assuming this continues, the 1-year and 10-year human-induced averages are similar as indicators of long-term climate change. Extrapolating either leads to a first breach of 1.5°C at roughly the same time in the early 2030s. The breach becomes more significant the longer it is sustained.
Note that the observed 1-year average data for 2024 is a rolling 12-month average produced before the end of 2024, hence is not directly comparable to all other data points.
The source, see below, explains all the above in more detail.
To see more clearly how the series are changing from year to year, select ‘Toggle change mode’ in the menu at the top right of the chart. Here you can also change to the temperature projection mode, which is described in the ‘Projection Quick Start’ section.
Graphs can be zoomed by dragging horizontally on the chart (or separate two fingers on touch screens). On desktop, pan left and right when zoomed in using the shift key.
The initial view shows projected peak global 21st century warming versus pre-industrial levels (and uncertainty ranges) under various policy scenarios, using a 66% chance level.
The chance level specifies the chance of the temperature staying below a certain value. You can click on the legend to enable/disable the 50%, 66% and 90% levels.
As temperatures are still increasing at the end of the century under all scenarios, ‘peak 21st century warming’ is the same as ‘warming at end of century’.
The policy scenarios are described by the source as follows:
Current policies – this scenario projects global warming assuming all currently adopted and implemented policies as at November 2023 are realized and that no additional measures are undertaken. When extended beyond 2030, it assumes a continuation of efforts at a similar level of ambition.
Unconditional NDCs – this scenario projects global warming assuming full implementation of the most recent NDCs (Nationally Determined Contribution – official national climate plans that get submitted every 5 years under the Paris Agreement) that do not depend on explicit external support (cut-off date: September 2024). When extended beyond 2030, it assumes a continuation of efforts at a similar level of ambition.
Conditional NDCs – in addition to the unconditional NDCs, this scenario encompasses the most recent NDC targets for which implementation is contingent on
receiving international support, such as finance, technology transfer and/or capacity-building (cut-off date: September 2024). When extended beyond 2030, it assumes a continuation of efforts at a similar level of ambition.
Conditional NDCs + all net-zero pledges – this is the most optimistic scenario included. It assumes the achievement of the conditional NDC scenario until 2030 and all net-zero or other long-term low emissions development strategy (LT-LEDS) pledges (cut-off date: July 2024) thereafter.
Visualisation by Climateninja.org.
Historical Source
The Data and some of the ‘Historical Quick Start’ description is taken directly from: Human-Induced and Observed Global Warming: Insights, Data, Charts: ClimateChangeTracker.org
The estimated 1.5C breach year is taken from: Current Trajectory Year Reaching 1.5°C Warming: Insights, Data, Charts: ClimateChangeTracker.org.
Both accessed 10/2024.
The data source for the above pages is:
Indicators of Global Climate Change 2023: annual update of key indicators of the state of the climate system and human influence, Piers M. Forster et al.
Credits: Smith, C., Walsh, T., Gillett, N., Hall, B., Hauser, M., Krummel, P., Lamb, W., Lamboll, R., Lan, X., Muhle, J., Palmer, M., Ribes, A., Schumacher, D., Seneviratne, S., Trewin, B., von Schuckmann, K., & Forster, P. (2024). ClimateIndicator/data: Indicators of Global Climate Change 2023 revision (v2024.05.29a) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8000192
To read the scientific detail about the generation of the above data see: ESSD – Indicators of Global Climate Change 2023: annual update of key indicators of the state of the climate system and human influence
Projection Source
Figure 4.2 on page 34 of:
United Nations Environment Programme (2024). Emissions Gap Report 2024: No more hot air … please! With a massive gap between rhetoric and reality, countries draft new climate commitments. Nairobi. https://doi.org/10.59117/20.500.11822/46404.
